Tribal Colleges and Universities Program (TCUP)

Award ceiling
$100,000 – $3,500,000
Closes
Oct 14, 2026
Last verified
2026-09-04

Awards $100,000 – $3,500,000 per recipient for others (see text field entitled "additional information on eligibility" for clarification), closing Oct 14, 2026.

Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)Science, Technology, Research & Development

In one sentence

Tribal Colleges and Universities Program (TCUP) awards $100,000 – $3,500,000 per recipient, open to others (see text field entitled "additional information on eligibility" for clarification), closing Oct 14, 2026.

Record fields
Program pool (total)
$10,799,836
Total across all awards in this programme. Not an amount any single applicant can receive.
Award ceiling (per project)
$3,500,000
Award floor
$100,000
Typical award
Not confirmed
Deadline
Oct 14, 2026
Deadline type
Fixed date
Opens
Jun 24, 2021
Status
Open
Eligible entities
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
Geography
Not stated
Matching funds
Not confirmed
Disbursement
Not confirmed
Application effort
Not confirmed
Use of funds
STEM education and research capacity improvements · Instructional design and curriculum development · Professional development for K-12 STEM teachers · Research infrastructure and cyberinfrastructure · Strategic planning and institutional assessment · Collaborative projects and partnerships
Currency
USD

How much money is available?

Two different figures govern a programme and they are not interchangeable. The programme pool is what the funder has allocated across every award it will make this cycle. The award ceiling is the most one applicant can be granted.

Program pool (total)Across all awards this cycle
$10,799,836
Award ceiling (per project)The most one applicant can receive
$3,500,000

Who can apply?

level
Derived from the source that published this record
entity
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
Source field: entity types
industry
demographic
Alaska Native-serving institutions, Federally recognized Tribal Colleges and Universities, Native Hawaiian-serving institutions
Source field: demographics
use
Collaborative projects and partnerships, Instructional design and curriculum development, Professional development for K-12 STEM teachers, Research infrastructure and cyberinfrastructure, STEM education and research capacity improvements, Strategic planning and institutional assessment
Source field: use of funds
size limit

Not confirmed

Source field: applicant size limit
clause text

*Who May Submit Proposals: Proposals may only be submitted by the following: -Organizations eligible to submit TCUP proposals are federally recognized Tribal Colleges and Universities, Alaska Native-serving institutions and Native Hawaiian-serving institutions. Multiple campuses of one university system are normally encouraged to consider collaborative submissions. Executive Order 13021 defines Tribal Colleges and Universities ("tribal colleges") as those institutions cited in section 532 of the Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 301 note), and other institutions that qualify for funding under the Tribally Controlled Community College Assistance Act of 1978, (25 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as well as Navajo Community College as authorized in the Navajo Community College Assistance Act of 1978, Public Law 95-471, Title II (25 U.S.C. 640a note). The term "Alaska Native-serving institution" means an institution of higher education that is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of the Higher Education Act; and that, at the time of submission, has an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native students. The term "Native Hawaiian-serving institution" means an institution of higher education that is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of the Higher Education Act; has a Carnegie classification of baccalaureate or associate's college; and has, at the time of submission, an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students.  By signing and submitting the proposal, the proposer is certifying that they meet the eligibility criteria specified in this program solicitation. Willful provision of false information in this request and its supporting documents or in reports required under an ensuing award is a criminal offense (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001). Eligibility may be verified by consulting the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) or other certified federal government data sources. Other institutions of higher education are eligible to submit collaborative proposals as non-leads with TCUP-eligible institutions under the TCUP Partnerships strands; limitations apply. *Who May Serve as PI: For the Instructional Capacity Excellence in TCUP Institutions (ICE-TI), TCU Enterprise Advancement (TEA) Centers, and TCUP Partnerships award strands, the principal investigator (PI) is expected to be the president, chief academic officer, another senior academic officer responsible for oversight and management of curriculum and instructional policies for the institution, or a senior STEM faculty member. Typically, the PI for Targeted STEM Infusion Projects (TSIP) or TCUP for Secondary and Elementary Teachers in STEM proposals (TSETS) would be a member of the STEM faculty, but STEM education faculty are encouraged to be part of the key leadership team. The PI for Small Grants for Research (SGR) proposals should be the lead researcher and would typically be a member of the STEM or STEM education faculty. For Cyberinfrastructure Health, Assistance, and Improvements (CHAI), the PI should be a senior STEM faculty member, but the chief information officer (CIO) is strongly encouraged to be part of the key leadership team. Prospective PIs are encouraged to consult TCUP program staff.

We store the structured fields above. Clause-by-clause text from the guidelines is not connected for this record.

When does it close?

Oct 14, 202637 daysDeadline type Fixed date

What can the money be used for?

6 categorys
The source’s own spending categories, and what is not parsed.
STEM education and research capacity improvementsInstructional design and curriculum developmentProfessional development for K-12 STEM teachersResearch infrastructure and cyberinfrastructureStrategic planning and institutional assessmentCollaborative projects and partnerships

These categories come from the source's own classification. A line-item cost table, where the programme publishes one, lives in the guidelines and is not parsed for this record.

What comparable notices state

113 records
Stated ceilings on open records in the same industry.

Among open records stored under Science, Technology, Research & Development, 113 of 353 state an award ceiling. Those that do run:

  • 25th percentile$500,000
  • Median$1,500,000
  • 75th percentile$5,000,000

A statistical estimate, not a prediction. It describes what a set of notices has published in this catalogue on the day you read it, and says nothing about what this programme will award. Records stating no ceiling are excluded rather than counted as zero, and the programme pool — what a funder has across every applicant — is a different column and is never mixed in.

Common questions

5 questions
Every answer is a stored field from this record. Questions the source did not answer are not asked.
How much can one applicant receive?
$100,000 – $3,500,000 per recipient.
How much funding is available in total?
$10,799,836 across the whole programme. This is the total the funder has allocated, not an amount any single applicant can receive.
When is the application deadline?
Oct 14, 2026.
Who is eligible to apply?
Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification).
What can the funding be used for?
STEM education and research capacity improvements, Instructional design and curriculum development, Professional development for K-12 STEM teachers, Research infrastructure and cyberinfrastructure, Strategic planning and institutional assessment, Collaborative projects and partnerships, as classified by the source.

AI summary of the source text

Optional. Every core field on this record is already above, free and complete.

AI summary of the source text

Studio reads this record’s stored eligibility and materials text and breaks it into separate points, each quoting the exact words it came from. It never writes application prose, never guesses at a field the source did not state, and never estimates anyone’s chances.

Included with Studio

Sign in
Provenance
Source pagegrants.gov
Retrieved2026-09-04
MethodAutomated check
First seen2026-09-03

The official page governs. If the source and this record disagree, the source is correct — programmes change their terms between our checks, so confirm every figure above before you apply.