Procurement standards

The rules a federal recipient must follow when buying goods and services with award money — documented competition above stated thresholds, written selection criteria, and a conflict-of-interest policy covering the people who decide.

Part of the GrantTrove grant funding glossary — one entry for every field the catalogue stores.

Also called Federal procurement rules · Purchasing standards

In detail

The thresholds are the part organisations trip over. Below a micro-purchase level almost nothing is required; above a simplified acquisition level a documented competitive process is, and the levels move.

The documentation is the requirement, not the outcome. Buying from the right supplier without a record of how the decision was made is still a finding.

Against allowable cost

Allowability asks whether the award may pay for a category of thing. Procurement asks whether the process of buying it was proper. A perfectly allowable purchase made without required competition is a questioned cost. Neither is a field here: the record holds what a notice said about the opportunity, not how a recipient later bought things.

How GrantTrove stores it

  • `use_of_funds` records the spending categories a notice states, and reads Not stated where it states none.
  • We do not publish thresholds or purchasing guidance. They move, they are set in regulation, and a stale copy would be worse than a link to the notice that cites them.

Common questions

Do procurement rules apply to a state subaward?

Where the money is federal, generally yes — the pass-through must pass the requirements down.

What are the thresholds?

They are set in regulation and they change, so we do not restate them. The notice cites the authority.

Is a sole-source purchase ever allowed?

Under stated conditions, with documentation. The regulation lists them.