Continuing Enhanced National Surveillance for Prion Diseases in the United States: eligibility guide
Last reviewed

Continuing Enhanced National Surveillance for Prion Diseases in the United States: eligibility guide

How to read the eligibility, amount and date fields on this record: who the notice names, what the ceiling of $25,000,000 does and does not mean, and which fields are silent.

This is a reading of one record in the catalogue: what its fields say, what they do not say, and which of them decide whether it is worth your time. The record itself, with its source link and the date we last confirmed it, is at Continuing Enhanced National Surveillance for Prion Diseases in the United States.

Who the notice says may apply

The notice names 14 applicant values, which fold into Nonprofit, Higher Ed, K-12 & School District, State & Local Gov, Tribal, Business, Open to any applicant. The stored values are the grantmaker's own words; the fold into nine classes is ours, and a source category with no honest home in it stays unmapped rather than being forced into the nearest one.

Subject area, in the source's categories: Health & Human Services.

Clearing every one of those is necessary and not sufficient. Eligibility screening is mechanical and happens before review, and a requirement stated in prose that no field captured will still remove an application. The notice is the document that governs.

Reading the money

  • Award ceiling (per project): $25,000,000
  • Award floor: $3,000,000
  • Programme pool (total): $25,000,000

The pool is close to the ceiling here. They are separate columns and neither is derived from the other: the program pool is what the programme holds across every award, the award ceiling is the most one applicant can receive.

Dates, and the one that is not on the page

Deadline: Not stated, recorded as a unknown deadline. A date is not a deadline — where a source published only a date, no hour was invented to fill the timestamp.

What is not here is the period of performance. The date fields on a record describe when you may apply, never when the funded work must happen, and we do not derive the second from the first.

How the money would reach you

This record is not marked reimbursement. Treat that as unknown rather than as an advance — the flag currently defaults to "not reimbursement" when a source is silent, which is a data gap we publish rather than hide, and the notice is what settles it.

On matching funds: the notice states no match is required.

Other open opportunities from Centers for Disease Control - NCEZID

Opportunity Deadline Award ceiling
Centers of Excellence in Healthcare Quality and Safety Not stated $22,000,000
Advancing Global Capacity to Detect and Respond to Fungal Diseases 2026-09-30 $0
DHQP Global NOFO Not stated $0

The funder's full profile is at Centers for Disease Control - NCEZID.

What we cannot tell you

What to write. This is a data product; proposal craft is a different trade and we do not practise it. Nothing on this page is drawn from the application instructions, and the review criteria are argumentative prose we deliberately do not extract — summarising them would turn the funder's standard into our paraphrase of it.

Whether the notice has changed since we read it. Every record carries the date it was last confirmed; an amendment published after that date is a change this page has not seen. The record links the notice, and the notice governs.

How this compares with looking the programme up at its own source. For federal programmes, Grants.gov is free and is the primary source — this page adds a reading, not a listing you cannot get elsewhere.

Sources

Field definitions

How we compare

In the catalogue

Read next

Author

avatar for GrantTrove Editorial
GrantTrove Editorial

Series

Programme guides

One reading per programme: who the notice names, what its amount fields do and do not mean, and which of them are silent.

Categories

More Posts

3

Newsletter

Join the community

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates